<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://community.kmtr.com/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Weather</title><link>http://community.kmtr.com/forums/962/ShowForum.aspx</link><description>Let's talk about the weather </description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.0 (Build: 60217.2664)</generator><item><title>Rain fall and snow levels</title><link>http://community.kmtr.com/forums/thread/3710163.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 02:13:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7599f546-9829-4584-83a0-fe3551f0410d:3710163</guid><dc:creator>Floyd Melton</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://community.kmtr.com/forums/thread/3710163.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://community.kmtr.com/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=962&amp;PostID=3710163</wfw:commentRss><description>Why doesn't anyone at the station ever discuss the snow depth in the mountains, and provide a comparison to average.&amp;nbsp; Also where do we stand in rain fall for the calendar year and rain year.&amp;nbsp; I never hear anything on these two subjects.&amp;nbsp; Your competitor did in the past but they even don't do it any more.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Floyd Melton&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Weather Dog</title><link>http://community.kmtr.com/forums/thread/1403511.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 22:30:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7599f546-9829-4584-83a0-fe3551f0410d:1403511</guid><dc:creator>xerxes</dc:creator><slash:comments>6</slash:comments><comments>http://community.kmtr.com/forums/thread/1403511.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://community.kmtr.com/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=962&amp;PostID=1403511</wfw:commentRss><description>Are my wife and I the only ones who dislike this feature on 1100 o'clock newscast?&amp;nbsp; I seems as though the talents of the staff could be used for something more productive than dressing up this dog&amp;nbsp;in a different outfit each night.&amp;nbsp; </description></item><item><title>Climate Momentum Shifting</title><link>http://community.kmtr.com/forums/thread/1632732.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 17:42:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7599f546-9829-4584-83a0-fe3551f0410d:1632732</guid><dc:creator>Cassandra</dc:creator><slash:comments>7</slash:comments><comments>http://community.kmtr.com/forums/thread/1632732.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://community.kmtr.com/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=962&amp;PostID=1632732</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;This is a lengthy article with several hot links... It is quite revealing about the climate issue, and how real science is is being covered up and omited or debunked,&amp;nbsp;from the public forum (Media), for the sake of of keeping us on a emotional roller coaster, and I think, in a state of fear...&amp;nbsp;Just follow the money&amp;nbsp;... I have the first paragraph here to start you out, and the hot link to the main article just below... Enjoy discussing this among yourselves...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.Blogs&amp;amp;ContentRecord_id=927b9303-802a-23ad-494b-dccb00b51a12&amp;amp;Region_id=&amp;amp;Issue_id"&gt;http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.Blogs&amp;amp;ContentRecord_id=927b9303-802a-23ad-494b-dccb00b51a12&amp;amp;Region_id=&amp;amp;Issue_id&lt;/A&gt;=&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P align=center&gt;&lt;FONT face="Times New Roman" size=5&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Climate Momentum Shifting:&amp;nbsp;Prominent Scientists Reverse Belief in Man-made Global Warming - Now Skeptics&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P align=center&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3&gt;Growing Number of Scientists Convert to Skeptics After Reviewing&amp;nbsp;New Research &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3&gt;Following the U.S. Senate's vote today on&amp;nbsp;a global warming measure (see today's AP article: &lt;B&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2007/05/15/ap3725193.html"&gt;&lt;FONT color=#0000ff&gt;Senate Defeats Climate Change Measure&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/A&gt;,) &lt;/B&gt;it is an opportune time to examine the recent and quite remarkable momentum shift taking place in climate science.&amp;nbsp;Many former believers in catastrophic man-made global warming have recently reversed themselves and are now climate skeptics.&amp;nbsp; The names included below are just a sampling of the prominent&amp;nbsp;scientists who have spoken out recently to oppose former Vice President Al Gore, the United Nations, and the media driven “consensus” on man-made global warming.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description></item><item><title>Interactive weather/climate info.</title><link>http://community.kmtr.com/forums/thread/1632863.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7599f546-9829-4584-83a0-fe3551f0410d:1632863</guid><dc:creator>Cassandra</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://community.kmtr.com/forums/thread/1632863.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://community.kmtr.com/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=962&amp;PostID=1632863</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Here is a interactive site for weather buffs... I found it to be rather interesting... Enjoy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/research/cag3/na.html"&gt;Click Here&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Edited to shorten Link name.&amp;nbsp; The long link title was pushing around
some or our headline lists on the KMTR.com homepage.&amp;nbsp; The link still
goes to exactly the same place, it's just shorter so that our Homepage
layout is preserved.&amp;nbsp; If anyone as any questions please email me at &lt;a class="linkification-ext" href="mailto:stevemorton@kmtr.com" title="Linkification: mailto:smorton@kmtr.com"&gt;stevemorton@kmtr.com&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp; Thanks,&lt;br&gt;Steve Morton&lt;br&gt;Webmaster&lt;br&gt;KMTR.com&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>A Question for Joseph</title><link>http://community.kmtr.com/forums/thread/1214324.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 18:49:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7599f546-9829-4584-83a0-fe3551f0410d:1214324</guid><dc:creator>Country Gardener</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><comments>http://community.kmtr.com/forums/thread/1214324.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://community.kmtr.com/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=962&amp;PostID=1214324</wfw:commentRss><description>I seem to observing a pattern that has persisted at least since last spring.&amp;nbsp; The temperature seems to fluctuate more rapidly than "normal". For instance, today we will be lucky to get out of the low 30's, but it was 52 two days ago. The low on Tuesday morning was 40; tomorrow you're predicting the teens.&amp;nbsp; Last summer was similar, with rapid fluctuations from low 80's to over 100.&amp;nbsp; While there is probably no such thing as "normal", how &lt;U&gt;un&lt;/U&gt;usual is this pattern?</description></item><item><title>Weather Questions</title><link>http://community.kmtr.com/forums/thread/959071.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 01:05:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7599f546-9829-4584-83a0-fe3551f0410d:959071</guid><dc:creator>wxman</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><comments>http://community.kmtr.com/forums/thread/959071.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://community.kmtr.com/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=962&amp;PostID=959071</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Everyone,&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This is meteorologist Joseph Calbreath.&amp;nbsp; I wanted to let you know that if you have any science questions I would be happy to find you&amp;nbsp;the answer.&amp;nbsp; My expertise is definitely the fields of Meteorology, Climatology and Geography but I'm well versed in most of the other sciences.&amp;nbsp; I'm also very good at looking up information and see this as a learning opportunity for me.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description></item><item><title>High Pressure</title><link>http://community.kmtr.com/forums/thread/1055636.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 01:03:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7599f546-9829-4584-83a0-fe3551f0410d:1055636</guid><dc:creator>david49</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://community.kmtr.com/forums/thread/1055636.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://community.kmtr.com/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=962&amp;PostID=1055636</wfw:commentRss><description>Why is Oregon more prone than other areas in the US to the development of stubborn high pressure ridges which translate into continuous periods (months!) of dry weather?</description></item></channel></rss>