News of the Day

U. S. Gov Site on Stimulus funds

MagicBus — Wed, 18 Nov 2009 01:11:10 GMT

From U. S. Gov Site on Stimulus funds.
http://origins.recovery.gov/Pages/TextView.aspx?data=stateSummaryAllZipCode&statecode=OR
For the zip code 97403, Eugene, Oregon 45.5 jobs created cost $176,420,205
Whereas 97310, Salem, Oregon 2,009.4 jobs created cost $143,211,722

The reason I went to the site http://recovery.gov was that Fox was reporting that massive amounts of the spending data was fake. So how accurate is Oregon’s data and how would you find out, given that the data reported to the feds could be fake? Reminds me of an old joke.
Farmer has problems with someone stealing his watermelons. So he puts up a sign that says,” One of these melons is poisoned”. The next morning the sign reads, “Two of these melons are poisoned.”

Total jobs 9,653.50
Cost   $1,853,303,189
Per job $191,982.51

Minus the 2 top job creators location
97403    5,484.50    $176,420,205
97310    2,009.40    $143,211,722
Total jobs minus 2 above 2159.6
Cost $1,533,671,262
Cost per job $710,164.50

Guest opinion from my wife

MagicBus — Sat, 14 Nov 2009 02:52:30 GMT

Guest opinion from my wife, The Eye Lady
I think it is wonderful that there is a “Breakfast With Santa” to benefit “Food for Lane County. It is sort of pricey though, $8 a ticket. I hope lots of moms and dads and aunts and uncles go as well, so that the goal of 200 tickets or $1600 can be raised to feed the needy. Sadly, so many Lane County and surrounding area children will not be able to attend, and then they go to school and hear the lucky children who can afford to go, brag about “Breakfast with Santa”. Most of the kids who benefit from “Food for Lane County” are inadvertently discriminated against because they are “POOR” or “NEEDY” or “DISABLED”. Some are even overtly bashed, bullied, etc. because they are different. I wish, truly wish, there were ways that some of the disadvantaged kids could participate in the walk with Santa, photos with Santa, and food with Santa. It’s sort of like a two way street, with only one lane being utilized.

Lying to a Federal Investigator.

MagicBus — Thu, 12 Nov 2009 02:39:08 GMT

Lying to a Federal Investigator.

A HUD investigator is a federal investigator, deliberately lying to a federal investigator investigating a federal crime is a serious crime, and according to the One-Year lease we were under caries federal prison time.
From HUD Report( scanned copies of actual report )
From: Kekahbah, Jennifer A Jennifer.A.Kekahbah@hud.gov
Date: Monday, September 29, 2008 8:09 AM
To:> (Kyle Bussey)
Subject: Case 10-07-0085-8
Attachment: FIR 10-07-0085-8.pdf (1.91 MB) ( FIR 10-07-0085-8.pdf (1.91 MB) )
Dear Mr. Bussey,
We have received your request as of September 26, 2008 for a copy of the FIR (Final Investigative Report), Closure Letter, Letter of Determination, Complaint regarding the following case: • 10-07-0085-8
As per your request, please find enclosed the documents requested in a PDF file. If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me directly at (206) 220-5324.
Thank you,
Jennifer Kekahbah
Administrative Assistant
Diane B. Nelson, Regional Director
FHEO, Region X

3-17-06 was a Friday, 3-20-06 was a Monday, 3-21-06 was a Tuesday. Letter postmarked March 20, 2006 would have to have been sent no sooner than 3-17-06.

What we have detailed above is a statement by Nancy Glines that we “have not been able to make an appointment to have the inspection completed” sent before the inspector called us. What had happened was the inspector called Friday morning to schedule an inspection. I told him my wife would need to talk with her therapist, he said, “No problem, I will be on the coast inspecting Monday, I’ll call you then”. He called Monday, set inspection for the next day. He and the landlord inspected and passed the unit.” No letters from the landlord saying we were such terrible tenants that we needed to be evicted. None, Noda, Zip.

Above you have David Flores providing false information to a federal investigator twice.

Where are they now? Nancy Glines is with “The Majestic Theater Management” in Corvallis in a position paid totally by a “grant” from the Oregon Community Foundation, The Majestic Theater received a “bequest” of $200,000.00 which was put into an endowment under The Oregon Community Foundation, they are trying to get an endowment managed by the city of Corvallis moved to The Oregon Community Foundation. Nancy Waggoner was on a scholarship advisory board for The Oregon Community Foundation. David Flores is Still with Community Sharing Of Cottage Grove, Oregon.
By the way, I contacted rep.waynekrieger@state.or.us , who said he would contact the Lane County DA’s office about what they did or did not do concerning the shooting incident. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQQ4ystsAWo

Triage and Health Care

MagicBus — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:27:08 GMT

Triage
Etymology: French, sorting, sifting, from trier to sort, from Old French — more at try
Date: 1918 1 a : the sorting of and allocation of treatment to patients and especially battle and disaster victims according to a system of priorities designed to maximize the number of survivors b : the sorting of patients (as in an emergency room) according to the urgency of their need for care
2 : the assigning of priority order to projects on the basis of where funds and other resources can be best used, are most needed, or are most likely to achieve success” http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/Triage
I believe that triage should be used in dealing with Obama’s Health Care scheme. According to President Obama, fraud costs billions and they are aware of it. OK.before we as the American People turn our Health Care over to Obama and his “Other Partners” let’s see if you are sincere about stopping fraud. To make things interesting and involve the average American Citizen, we can use the “False Claims Act”. www.justice.gov/usao/pae/Documents/fcaprocess2.pdf www.gao.gov/new.items/d06320r.pdf http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_Claims_Act
To see how amicable the Obama government is to this idea I will email a brief synopsis of the Lane County Incident, to every Democratic member of Oregon Legislature and the U. S. Senate and House of Representatives. Their responses will be used to judge whether to re-elect them when they come up for re-election, recall if needed.
To recap the case I will use: See video. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQQ4ystsAWo .
While living in Federally subsidized housing in Lane County Oregon a disabled female minority person and her husband were shot at by their landlord. They had voiced a complaint concerning Community Sharing Program of Cottage Grove, Oregon, Nancy Glines (Mason) Executive Director, David Flores, Case Manager, and Faye Stewart, Board member of both Lane County Board of County Commissioners and Community Sharing Program of Cottage Grove, were “invoicing the Federal Government for services not rendered” in violation of
31 U.S.C. § 3729 : US Code - Section 3729: False claims
(http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/uscode/31/III/37/III/3729) . Lane County through it’s agents used known fraudulent writings to remove us from the federally subsidized housing program, and while still under the contractual provisions of the one-year lease Lane County failed to protect the civil rights of us by not properly investigating and prosecuting the RICO chargeable firearm violations.
I am currently waiting to see what Oregon’s U. S. Senator Ron Wyden’s office will do with this case after telling me that they would contact HUD on my behalf.
Extensive information online at http://community.kmtr.com/forums/821/ShowForum.aspx
Foundation Trilogy , by foundation trilogy

Bill Dwyer’s suggestion

MagicBus — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 03:20:20 GMT

Bill Dwyer’s suggestion
When we file a RICO case in federal court, the “community Foundations”, Lane County and the State of Oregon will be in a strange legal situation. If they decide to ask the court to let them join in the proceeding, they will have to prove that they are an entity that has liability under RICO. If they do not join in, they can be held liable without being present to cross-examine any witnesses. I have asked each entity to engage in pre-trial settlement talks. Each refused. I had to ask each one to show that I have tried to settle this out of court. So I’ll follow Bill Dwyer’s suggestion, and “just sue.”

What's it all about ALF-ie?

MagicBus — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 03:29:05 GMT

What's it all about ALF-ie?
So talked with U. S. Senator Ron Wyden's office. The fax I sent is reproduced below. I Talked with an ALFie about possible mediation. I sent him the Wyden fax plus the information following it. Will Wyden's office do the right thing? Will ALFie contact his masters? Will Faye "stumps" Stewart make a tree statue of himself? Who knows. I'll spend Friday contacting every Republican in the Senate and House to drum up some support. I only have 5 more years to work thing out.
John Michaels;
I spoke with you Monday Oct. 26 concerning a problem with how Lane County Commissioners were using federal housing funds, invoicing the federal government for services not rendered in violation of the false claims act.

Background
We enrolled in HOME TBA in February of 2005 - 2007.
HOME TBA is a Federally funded housing program that uses HUD section 8 tenant based assistance rules. The funds are granted to the State of Oregon, they sub-grant funds to Lane County Oregon Board of County Commissioners. The Lane County Commissioners subcontract the case management to a “not for profit”( Community Sharing Program in Cottage Grove, Oregon).
Our first case management worker was Maria Lopez. We received an accommodation that I was to stay in the home with my wife because of her disability and not have to participate in the job search requirements of the HOME TBA program, our “Plan for Self Sufficiency” was constructing an Online Jewelry Store that accepted credit cards, through PayPal, while she and I stocked the store from estate sales and thrift store purchases. This plan was approved by her therapist, Maria Lopez, Community Sharing, Lane County and the State of Oregon. Part of the requirements of the HOME TBA program was that in return for enhanced case management services we participate in a “Plan for Self Sufficiency”, this differentiates it from a regular Section 8 which is only rental subsidy which has no extra services for increased case management that leads to Self Sufficiency. The enhanced case management services and program requirements are detailed in the block grant submitted to the federal government by the Housing and Community Services Department of the State of Oregon. This grant submittal forms the contractual provisions and services that will be provided by the State of Oregon and its sub-grantee’s. It is the duty of the State of Oregon and the Lane County Board of County Commissioners to make sure that the “not for profit” is delivering the services required in the state grant contract. Failure to provide oversight of federally funded programs can result in future denial of federal funding, fines and/or federal imprisonment. Use of fraudulent writings to deny services to a client carries penalties and is specifically listed at the end of the “lease agreement” signed by the client, the landlord and Lane County. Records are required to be kept for 5 years. The statute of limitations are further extended because this complaint includes a RICO triggering firearm offence, complaint documented by Lane County Sheriff’s report and Lane County DA case file Re: us v Alvin Johnson, the RICO statute of limitations goes for 7 years after the termination of investigation by Lane County DA.

After speaking with U. S. Senator Ron Wyden’s staff member John Michaels on Monday October 26 2009, he requested that I send him a fax containing the specific allegations that I believe were not properly addressed in our original HUD complaint. I request U. S. Senator Ron Wyden’s office facilitate a RICO based HUD investigation of this situation.

Facts:
Community Sharing, Nancy Glines then Executive Director, David Flores, then case worker for us and Faye Stewart, member of Community Sharing Board of Directors, failed to provide services required by HOME TBA grant, including improper and insufficient case management documentation, failure to provide any supportive services relating to the online store such as referrals to state agencies like Minority Women Small Business group specifically mentioned in State of Oregon block grant request, failure to even view the online store at WWW.AtticJewelry.Com as evidenced by web logs and absence of them registering on website. Failure to do a proper evaluation of web site by a competent person. Failure to even put a notice of the website in the Community Sharing newsletter during the holiday season, The lack of publication in their newsletter shows a total lack of even the smallest iota of support by the “not for profit” in this situation. Lack of paperwork concerning the “savings account” provision of the HOME TBA Program. Lack of required support when clients vehicle broke down which compromised their ability to shop for food, get medicine, visit doctors and therapists, and go to required HOME TBA case meetings. The Community Sharing Program has had a long association with South Lane Wheels, which shares office space with them, and was listed in their newsletter as a provider of these exact services. Failure to notify the clients of this available service to a medically dependent rural isolated client during the winter months is inconceivable and unconscionable. The informing of locally available services such as this transportation service is something that doesn’t cost the “not for profit” any funds and is listed in the block grant as a service that should be provided by the case management team under referrals to local state, government and local services. This provision allows the case management to parlay outside services into their program without incurring added costs. Failure to notify the client of a service provided by the “not for profit’s” sister agency shows a total lack of concern for the health and safety of the client.

When we notified the executive director, Nancy Glines, Lane County Human Services, Nancy Waggoner, and State of Oregon Housing and Community Services, Jodie Jones and Mary Gentry that David Flores was not providing required services under the HOME TBA Contract, they retaliated by removing us from the program using 2 known fraudulent writings. In the termination of services letter sent to us by Nancy Waggoner she states that we will be terminated because of not complying with David Flores’ “Plan for Self Sufficiency” and being evicted by our landlord. To date no one has produced the actual signed, by us and David Flores, document. During a limited hearing conducted by Steve Manela, Lane County Human Services Commission, I requested that they fax to me the document from our case file that they used in our hearing. They did not send the document from our case file but rather downloaded a different document from the internet, resized it, taped it to a sheet of paper and faxed that document to us. They knew that it was not from our Community Sharing case file. They proffered a fake document instead of the requested document. This clearly violates the warning against using fraudulent writings to deny services listed at the end of the HOME TBA Contract. The “eviction notice” by the landlord was based upon a “Month to Month” rental agreement sent to the attorney, Dean Kaufman, of Alvin Johnson, landlord, By Nancy Waggoner’s office. The eviction never went to court, but Nancy Waggoner cut off HOME TBA assistance funds before the case could have been heard by a court according to the “eviction notice”. Lane County Human Services Commission knew that they did not send the HUD approved HOME TBA One Year Lease that included federal protections to the landlord’s attorney but sent a 2 year old “free internet form” “Month to Month rental agreement”. The document has printed on it “free internet rental form” and in no stretch of the imagination could have been confused with the HUD approved One Year Lease Agreement signed and sent to us by Nancy Waggoner’s office 2 months prior. Dean Kaufman, as a landlord tenant attorney and former judge, could not mistake a one page “free internet rental form” for a lease that was used by a state regarding federal housing funds. I became aware that the “eviction notice” was based upon a fraudulent writing through a series of exchanged e-mails with Dean Kaufman. In those e-mails he admits that the eviction notice is based on the wrong document and faxes to me the document he received from Nancy Waggoner’s office. The eviction was dropped and Dean Kaufman and Alvin Johnson offered to allow us to remain in the home at 81723 Mahr Lane Creswell, Oregon for the remainder of the one year lease period “without any further payment of rent”. Our HOME TBA funds had been cut off by Nancy Waggoner prior to this time. HOME TBA funds are applied to rent and utilities. So our HOME TBA subsidy could have been applied to our electricity bills while we were not required to pay rent.
Then the landlord started shooting at us with a shotgun. He shot at us 14 times over a two week period. We called 911 twice. Lane County Sheriff’s Deputies came twice. A Rico triggering firearm complaint was filed. Reports were written. Video tape was taken into evidence (video available at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQQ4ystsAWo with added editorial comments added).
The case was turned over to the Lane County DA’s Office. The DA’s Office, which relies on the Lane County Board of Commissioners and grants from the Department of Justice for the majority of their funding, did not pursue this case but let it sit for 2 years un-prosecuted. Faye Stewart sat on both the Lane County Board of Commissioners and the Board of Community Sharing. Nancy Glines was Executive Director of Community Sharing and heavily involved with securing “Department of Justice” grants for Lane County and listed as a “cohort” of Faye Stewart

“RIPPLE, Rural Information, Practices & Peer Learning Exchange,
“Networking: Not a Naughty Act
http://www.ripplenw.org/
Networking is a misunderstood practice. It has been portrayed as the self-serving pastime of furthering one’s interests by socializing with the right people. That connotation is sadly limiting. The secret to networking does not lie in knowing the right people or being a shameless schmooze, the secret is understanding its worth.”

http://www.ripplenw.org/rdi/ripple/communities/south_lane_county/
“South Lane County (Cottage Grove)
2004, Cohort #1
Terry Arnold, Julie Gardner, Matt Parsons, Robert Ball, JoAnn Gray, Joe Raade, Teresa Cowan, Robert Hunt, Al Roberts, Ron Davis, James Kline, Celia Scott, George Devine, Mary Koepfle, Kirsten Snyder, Michael Fleck, Cory Kirshner-Lira, Faye Stewart, Tim Flowerday, Kathleen MacGregor, Lloyd Williams
South Lane County
2006, Cohort #2
Bill McCoy, Dan Olsen, Marc Steinberg, Carlos De Santiago, Jared Laskey, Jacques LeCoure, Jeff Larson, Kris Ackerman, Brian Steckler, Will Prater, Lonn Robertson, Ann White, Rick McGreggor, Matt Harrison, Rose Formosa, Karen Snyder, Tara Sue Salusso, Jordan Lampe, Sharon Jean, Heather Murphy, Anna Dolan, Sheila Hale, Carol Campbell, Carrie Petitti, Maria Best, Robert Clack, Nancy Glines, Christina Lund, Shawn Hitteneberg, Amy Callahan, Jane Christensen, Pam Reber”
(ED. Note, when Nancy Glines was called a cohort of Faye Stewart it was accurate.)”

You will notice that almost all of Community Sharing’s Board of Directors and South Lane Wheels are “Cohorts” of Faye Stewart.
At some point in time after July 2006 the Oregon Department of Housing and Community Services sent to the Oregon Governor’s Office, a document that states that Lane County knew that the eviction did not proceed to court or result in an actual eviction in July. Nothing was done to correct this problem by any of the State or County agencies required by law to protect the rights of clients of HOME TBA.

I request that at a minimum the HUD investigator acquire from
the State of Oregon: All material pertaining to us, all grant submissions for HOME TBA funds, All case files relating to Community Sharing Program of Cottage Grove, Oregon, comparative case files of two other counties for comparison, all correspondence relating to us, Community Sharing, Nancy Glines, David Flores and Nancy Waggoner.

Lane County: All files relating to Community Sharing, us, Nancy Glines, Nancy Waggoner and David Flores including emails and board minutes and all hearings.

Community Sharing Program of Cottage Grove, Oregon: The complete Files of us, a disabled client, a native American case file for comparison. A case file that includes job search, a case file containing a savings account, a case concerning referral to local help agencies for comparison to see if we were treated “the same as anyone else”. Including all faxes, emails, and case notes/documents board minutes and all hearings.

Lane County HUD: a case involving section 8 TBA. One disabled person, one native American, one savings account client and one job search client

If you need clarification on any matters please contact me.

(I then contacted Cliff Jones with TACS also a member of ALF, to see if he would mediate our dispute. Short version, he said no. Just exhausting every conceivable option before dragging ol' Stumps into court and by extension changing the "community foundation/not for profit" system in Oregon.

Cliff Jones;

I have a scheduled phone call with you for Thursday at 3:30.
I am contacting you as a possible mediator in the situation outlined below. Briefly, a “not for profit” was receiving federal housing funds and invoicing the federal government for services it did not provide. The incident escalated to the point of my wife and I being shot at 14 times with a shotgun over a 2 week period. I have contacted you because of your background and your affiliation to Faye Stewart and members of the Oregon Community Foundation and the Myers Foundation through ALF and TACS.
Since the situation involves a RICO covered offence all participants including funding foundations would come under the strong provisions of the federal RICO laws, which include confiscation of assets, federal prison time and barring from participation affected types of employment for life. I mention this because it shows the extreme penalties and sanctions that a state, county foundation or associated “not for profit” organization could receive because incidents were covered-up by higher-ups in an organization. At the start it began as an employee of a “not for profit” not doing his job as Ann White , board member once stated. But because Nancy Glines had to protect David Flores, for whatever reason, Nancy Glines was protected by Faye Stewart, both members of South Lane County (Cottage Grove) 2004, Cohort #1 and South Lane County 2006, Cohort #2, which includes the majority of the “not for profit” board, and all of them were protected by Victor Merced, Victor Merced Morales Flores y Jimenez formally with Meyer Memorial trust now with State of Oregon Housing and Community Services. What started as David Flores not doing his job results in a situation where the assets of the Oregon Community Foundation, the Meyer Memorial Trust and the State of Oregon and all associated “not for profits” are put in jeopardy, with lifetime bans from receiving federal funding or engaging in any similar business for life. My aim is not to put the Oregon Community into receivership or disband their 200 plus “not for profits” but rather to come to a a just settlement without having to drag everyone else involved into various state and federal courts. The recent federal stimulus bill and upcoming healthcare reform bill both include massive funding for NGO’s and should not be put in jeopardy because one low level employee at an obscure “not for profit” wasn’t doing his job. The information above was faxed to U. S. Senator Ron Wyden’s office. It is self explanatory. RICO laws give me at least 5 more years to pursue my fight for justice. http://community.kmtr.com/forums/821/ShowForum.aspx
gives extensive background on the underlying situation.

I look forward to resolving this with you in our phone conversation Thursday at 3:30.

OOPS, they did it again.

MagicBus — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 01:59:07 GMT

OOPS, they did it again.
I received a call from John Michaels with Senator Ron Wyden’s Office Monday, Oct 26. I will be faxing specific information regarding Lane County Oregon’s County Commissioners involvement in using known bogus and fraudulent documents in upholding removal of a disabled minority person from federally subsidized housing in retaliation for reporting fraud by a not for profit which Lane County Commissioner Faye Stewart sat on the board of the not for profit, Community Sharing of Cottage Grove Oregon. I conveyed my concerns that the difficulty in resolving this matter directly relates to what will happen if there are not strong oversight provisions placed into the up-coming health care reform. I also ran across a report that Lane County was “caught” invoicing Medicaid over $900,000.00 for “services not rendered” connected with
“State auditors. say Lane County Mental owes $930,000 for overbilling the federal Medicaid program for services that the county provided to state patients three years ago.”
http://www.thefreelibrary.com/State+accuses+Lane+County+of+overbilling.-a0172998917 and
“County to shut down mental health care provider Valia
By Matt Cooper
The Register-Guard
Appeared in print: Monday, Oct 12, 2009
Lane County plans to close a pioneering Springfield mental health care provider Thursday, forcing 100 or so clients with severe conditions to get services elsewhere.
The closure of Valia Health Resources would cap a yearlong effort by the county to shut down what it calls a poorly run operation. But a Valia official said the county has acted illegally, and the provider will fight to stay open.” http://www.registerguard.com/csp/cms/sites/web/news/cityregion/21378064-41/story.csp
The County Commissioners are responsible for overseeing government funds that they “grant” or disperse to “not for profits”. That is part of their job, if they don’t do their job, fire them. If they show a pattern of this, put them in jail as the law demands.

Gov tracking system

MagicBus — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 21:30:22 GMT

Gov tracking system
Found new gov site for tracking bills. http://www.opencongress.org

Normal 0 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:#0400; mso-fareast-language:#0400; mso-bidi-language:#0400;}

Normal 0 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:#0400; mso-fareast-language:#0400; mso-bidi-language:#0400;}

Snuggy’s for the Snuggyless

MagicBus — Fri, 23 Oct 2009 21:15:52 GMT

Here’s a great game to play, start a “club”, I’ll call it the “circle club”. First we name our closest friends as Pres, Vice Pres. , Secretary, and Treasurer. Now pick a logo, something that implies rotation or a circle. We will chose a widget, you know those gear things in watches. Next is the secret handshake, ours will be, when I shake your right hand, I reach around with my left and grab your wallet (I stole this from a Bing Crosby movie, it’s called the politician handshake). Now we pick a project that preys on people’s sympathy, how about children. Everyone likes kids. So well have a project called “Relief Nursery”. We will put up a small amount of our funds to get it started say $5,000. Now for the fun part, with a bit of backroom deals and using our “political influence” we get over $180,000 in federal start-up grants. Later we can get state money of around $200,000 a year as a mandatory pass through grant that is specifically directed to our club project. Now to put into place the real reason why we did all this, let’s establish a “Advised Endowment Fund” that we control to hold the funds so we can “invest” the money in our other “projects”, you know provide them with seed funds to be used as “matching funds for federal grants”, don’t worry we keep all the money in our Advised Endowment Fund so we are actually only changing which pocket we keep the money in, the trick is to be the one who wears the pants of many pockets. So what do we have, we put in a few dollars, now we can give paid staff jobs to our friends that are paid with tax payer funds and we look like “Socially and Politically correct humanitarianS” (SaPS). If you’d like to do a scam like this you just need to set up a foundation account($10,000 buy in, we match that but since this is a pyramid scheme, we keep the money in our “umbrella fund”) I’m starting one based on the “snuggy”. It will provide “Snuggy’s” for the homeless, or rather Snuggiless, I’ll call it “The Lane County Cover-up”. I’ll contact Lane County Commissioner Faye Stewart to see if he’ll set up the “Community Foundation” for it under the CGCF, got to be in his pyramid, get the “Circles Club” to grant me $5,000, hit folks up for donations, have a “Run for Cover, the foundation is coming 5K-Run”. If we don’t raise the matching $5,000, the Baronet of Tree Stumps can donate the shortfall so in our newspaper blurb it will say “With the help of the Baronet of Tree Stumps the “Lane County Cover-up” successfully covered up the snuggiless problem.” Donate now, your donation could be tax deductible and may be used to fund the Baronet of Tree Stump’s Shrine and Snuggy Museum. We are required to back-date a donation to an affiliated foundation scheme to keep in good standing in the great Pyramid scheme of Oregon.
Don’t actually donate because Stumpy isn’t my friend until I “grant” him the initial $5,000 via a campaign contribution for his re-election. See if he doesn’t get re-elected he can’t divert tax funds to the “Lane County Cover-up” and if the “cover-up project” falls apart embarrassing things would get revealed.

Faye H. Stewart
Occupational Background: Business partner in Stewart and
Sons LLC., Faye and Lucille Stewart Foundation (director), and
Bohemia Foundation (director).
Education: Cottage Grove High School, Lane Community
College and Oregon State University.
Prior and Current Public Service: Cottage Grove Planning
Commission, South Lane School District Budget Committee,
Schools of the Future Committee in South Lane School District,
and Lane County Sheriff's Office Search and Rescue.
Community Service: Habitat for Humanity, Relay for Life, 4-H,
Cottage Grove Chamber of Commerce, Booster Club, Cottage
Grove's wrestling team, Western Oregon Exposition Fair,
Bohemia Mining Days, Eugene Mission, Cottage Grove BMX
track, Cub Scouts, Senior Wheels, Community Sharing, Cottage
Grove Masonic Lodge Advised Endowment Fund for Cottage Grove Relief Nursery (committee
chairman), Bohemia Gold Mining Museum, Bohemia Mine Owners Association (board member and
Liaison Committee chairman), and Dorena Parent Club.

In 1993 several Rotarians and community minded citizens joined together to form a non-profit organization designed to prevent child abuse and neglect through strengthening families under stress. The Nursery was formed as a result of two high-profile child abuse cases in Cottage Grove and was modeled after the nationally recognized Eugene (Oregon) Relief Nursery. This proven program which was started with an initial grant of $5,000 by our club was able to leverage over $180,000 in a federal start-up grant that lasted for three years. The nursery provides home based visits and early childhood therapeutic development for infants and toddlers through age 3 plus parenting classes and support. Since 1993, the Cottage Grove Rotary Club has contributed over $23,000 towards this project with Rotarians still on its Board. The Nursery has eight paid staff members with an annual budget of over $235,000 and they are currently serving 35 children.
http://district5110.org/ClubProjects/ReliefNursery

http://www.lanecounty.org/bcc_info/Meeting_Info/2001/OrderText/2001/6-27/01-6-27-23.pdf

http://arcweb.sos.state.or.us/governors/goldschmidt/box025/goldschmidt_025_030.pdf

http://www.alfo.org/downloads/Class22Biographies.pdf

http://74.125.113.132/search?q=cache:8mxR3aSs7GsJ:www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G1-155757455.html+Cottage+Grove%27s+Relief+Nursery&cd=8&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G1-132724907.html

http://www.theworldlink.com/articles/2009/10/22/news/doc4ae092cc89577903101371.txt

The Stewart Shrine in Cottage Grove

MagicBus — Thu, 22 Oct 2009 01:47:12 GMT

The Stewart Shrine in Cottage Grove

In case you missed it Brother Faye is building a shrine in Cottage Grove. You don’t have to donate; Ol’ Faye Stewart is lobbying Senator Jeff Merkley for pieces of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act money. I personally feel proud that tax payer money meant to revitalize the U.S. economy is being stalked by Faye Stewart to finance his personal shrine in downtown Cottage Grove, Oregon. Maybe the folks that lost their timber jobs when the Stewarts sold out their Bohemia Co. will get to sleep in the Stewart Shrine Park. Part of the initial money to start the Shrine Project came from the Bohemia Foundation. Here’s the way I see it, instead of paying taxes on selling out their Bohemia timber company, they put it into a tax-free foundation administered by Faye Stewart. Then he “grants” those tax-free funds to build the Stewart Shrine. So tax payers have to pay more taxes because their Lane County Commissioner Faye Stewart, whose county salary comes from your taxes, is “granting” his tax-free funds, driving his county supplied truck to Cottage Grove, Oregon to try to get even more tax payers money for his personal shrine. http://www.cottagegrove.org/oldupdates/apr2009.html
“April 17, 2009

Sesquicentennial Snippet
The celebration continues for the 150th Anniversary of Oregon’s Statehood. Bohemia Mining Days continues to prepare for the celebration this summer. Be sure to mark your calendars and join in the celebration of the 50th Anniversary of Bohemia Mining Days and the 150th (sesquicentennial) of Oregon’s Statehood, July 10th through 19th.

Congratulations to Jennifer Violette who knows about carpet. She correctly responded that the state symbol in the carpet of the Oregon State House of Representatives is the Douglas Fir.

This week the question is what current city in Oregon has the lowest population?

Senator Merkley Staff Visit
Mayor Williams, Lane County Commissioner Faye Stewart and the City Manager met with Dan Whelan, Field Representative for Senator Jeff Merkley. They discussed many of the pieces of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. They also discussed many of the projects underway in Cottage Grove, specifically the Bohemia Park, Broadband and Solar projects. “

Unfortunately, I missed the Fay Stewart parade, Bohemia Mining Days, because I had the audacity to question why Faye Stewart’s “not for profit” Community Sharing program was invoicing the federal government for services not rendered. Guess Ol’ Faye just wants everyone to give him millions of dollars because his great grand father was a timber baron. So what do you call a great grand son of a baron? It could be a Baronet, Def: “Baronet is the British hereditary rank of honour. It was first created by James I in the year 1611, to amass funds supposedly for support of troops in Ulster. The "baronet" is neither an order for knighthood nor is it a part of the peerage. In hierarchy, the baronet ranks below a baron but above all knights with the exception of the Knight of the Garter.” That sounds about right a fake title to raise funds. So I’ll pay homage to Ol’ Faye’s historic title by addressing him as The Right Honorable the Lord Baronet of Tree Stumps.

Coming attractions: how much does funding of “not for profits” run by cohorts of The Right Honorable the Lord Baronet of Tree Stumps Faye Stewart cost Lane County Oregon and the U. S. Tax payer? South Lane Wheels, board packed with The Right Honorable the Lord Baronet of tree stumps Faye Stewart’s cohorts. Their first Stimulus grant is around $80,000.00.

It is all relative

MagicBus — Sat, 17 Oct 2009 01:56:26 GMT

It is all relative

I’ll make this one short, not including all those references to Lane County Oregon Commissioners board meetings and Lane County documents.
“BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' WORK SESSION
January 23, 2007 9:00 a.m. Commissioners' Conference Room
APPROVED 2/21/07
Commissioner Faye Stewart presided with Commissioners Bill Dwyer, Bill Fleenor, Bobby Green, Sr. and Peter Sorenson present. County Administrator Bill Van Vactor, Assistant County Counsel Stephen Vorhes and Recording Secretary Melissa Zimmer were also present.”

In 2007 Faye Hills Stewart II voted to pass a measure 37 claim for Lasells “Bud” Stewart.

“Commissioner Stewart opened the Public Hearing. He asked if there were any ex parte contacts or any conflicts of interest.
Stewart declared that one of the applicants today is his second cousin, Bud Stewart.”

From the preceding post you will remember that engaging in the discussion and voting on matters that involve relatives is a “Conflict of interest” and according to Land use procedures voting on “conflict of interest” matters is forbidden. But cousin Bud was only seeking a 2 MILLION DOLLAR measure 37 claim.
Still looking into faye hills stewart II land transaction with Bruce Stewart.
Next post: did Faye vote on Measure 37 claims presented by Ronald A Irvine, P.C. 210 S. 5th st. Cottage Grove, Oregon. It appears that Irvine was involved with Faye in the Faye Stewart Trust and the Faye and Lucille Stewart Foundation.

So much for trusting our Civil Serpents.

Happy Fathers Day

MagicBus — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 18:06:33 GMT

Happy Fathers Day
http://www.leg.state.or.us/ors/244.html

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

      244.120 Methods of handling conflicts; Legislative Assembly; judges; appointed officials; other elected officials or members of boards. (1) Except as provided in subsection (2) of this section, when met with an actual or potential conflict of interest, a public official shall:
      (a) If the public official is a member of the Legislative Assembly, announce publicly, pursuant to rules of the house of which the public official is a member, the nature of the conflict before taking any action thereon in the capacity of a public official.
      (b) If the public official is a judge, remove the judge from the case giving rise to the conflict or advise the parties of the nature of the conflict.
      (c) If the public official is any other appointed official subject to this chapter, notify in writing the person who appointed the public official to office of the nature of the conflict, and request that the appointing authority dispose of the matter giving rise to the conflict. Upon receipt of the request, the appointing authority shall designate within a reasonable time an alternate to dispose of the matter, or shall direct the official to dispose of the matter in a manner specified by the appointing authority.
      (2) An elected public official, other than a member of the Legislative Assembly, or an appointed public official serving on a board or commission, shall:
      (a) When met with a potential conflict of interest, announce publicly the nature of the potential conflict prior to taking any action thereon in the capacity of a public official; or
      (b) When met with an actual conflict of interest, announce publicly the nature of the actual conflict and:
      (A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B) of this paragraph, refrain from participating as a public official in any discussion or debate on the issue out of which the actual conflict arises or from voting on the issue.
      (B) If any public official’s vote is necessary to meet a requirement of a minimum number of votes to take official action, be eligible to vote, but not to participate as a public official in any discussion or debate on the issue out of which the actual conflict arises.
      (3) Nothing in subsection (1) or (2) of this section requires any public official to announce a conflict of interest more than once on the occasion which the matter out of which the conflict arises is discussed or debated.
      (4) Nothing in this section authorizes a public official to vote if the official is otherwise prohibited from doing so. [1974 c.72 §10; 1975 c.543 §7; 1987 c.566 §15; 1993 c.743 §15]

      244.130 Recording of notice of conflict; effect of failure to disclose conflict. (1) When a public official gives notice of an actual or potential conflict of interest, the public body as defined in ORS 174.109 that the public official serves shall record the actual or potential conflict in the official records of the public body. In addition, a notice of the actual or potential conflict and how it was disposed of may in the discretion of the public body be provided to the Oregon Government Ethics Commission within a reasonable period of time.
      (2) A decision or action of any public official or any board or commission on which the public official serves or agency by which the public official is employed may not be voided by any court solely by reason of the failure of the public official to disclose an actual or potential conflict of interest. [1974 c.72 §11; 1975 c.543 §8; 1993 c.743 §16; 2007 c.865 §9]

http://www.lanecounty.org/BCC_Info/Meeting_Info/2006/2006Minutes/May/06-5-17Aft.htm

"BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS'

REGULAR MEETING

May 17, 2006

1:30 p.m.

Commissioners' Conference Room

APPROVED 6/21/06

Commissioner Faye Stewart presided with Commissioners Bobby Green, Sr., Anna Morrison and Peter Sorenson present. Bill Dwyer present via telephone. County Administrator Bill Van Vactor, Assistant County Counsel Stephen Vorhes and Recording Secretary Melissa Zimmer were also present." ...

"b. PUBLIC HEARING AND ORDER 06-5-17-16/In the Matter of Considering a Ballot Measure 37 Claim and Deciding Whether to Modify, Remove or Not Apply Restrictive Lane Use Regulations in Lieu of Providing Just Compensation (PA 05-6478, Stewart).
Commissioner Stewart stated that due to state law, he had to remove himself from this hearing as he has a direct conflict, as this is his dad’s claim. He turned the meeting over to Commissioner Green and left the room.
Howe explained that the applicant acquired the property in 1969 and it was unzoned at that time. He indicated the property is on Stewart Hills Lane, four miles southwest of Cottage Grove. He said it is currently zoned rural residential, five-acre minimum and is 13 acres in size. He said the information the applicant provided was a realtor’s opinion of the value. He said the Board has to determine if they feel it represents a reduction in fair market value. He said the applicant wants to divide the property into smaller lots. He asked if the Board was comfortable with the value reduction opinion, then it would be a valid claim because of the date of acquisition.
Commissioner Green opened the Public Hearing.
Green asked if there were any other ex parte contacts.
There were none.
Bruce Stewart, Cottage Grove, stated he is the applicant. He purchased the property in 1969 and at that time it was unzoned. He said he bought it to enjoy and a place for his children to have a future home. He said land use laws and zoning didn’t let him previously build on the land. He tried to apply for a RR2 zoning but was denied. He indicated he presently has two legal lots of 13 acres. He stated that part of buying the property was a form of retirement investment. He stated he met all of Measure 37’s criteria.
John W. Gorny, Cottage Grove, stated they had nothing against the development because Stewart’s first priority is family. He was concerned about the traffic, the water problem and in order to get onto his property, they have to take Stewart Hills Road. He said the road is a gravel road and it is a problem for them with the dust.
Nolene Wheeler, Cottage Grove, said she is a neighbor. She said she is neutral on this. She indicated she lives on 3/10th of an acre that is bordered by Mosby Creek Road. She lives in a house there because her mother bought the property in 1962 and two cabins were built on it before it was controlled by the County. She said the County let them rebuild a house that was damaged by a fallen tree and to rebuild, they were grandfathered in because they already had a septic and well system. She was concerned about being a streamside resident. She hoped her neighbors would find satisfaction in the process.
Michael King, Cottage Grove, stated he is a landowner who lives on property adjacent to Bruce Stewart. He said the land use regulations are there for a purpose. He commented with the division of land there would be more people by the creek. He said people come and swim in the creek and discard trash. He stated that the land is for everyone and he doesn’t understand why people are able to split land and destroy it.
Samuel King, Cottage Grove, said he had been affected by the previous actions of Bruce Stewart. He added that this claim would change the zoning of the land. He thought the Measure 37 claim should be rejected because there would be a negative effect on people in the community. He was concerned about trespassing. He thought a public nuisance would be increased traffic. He said they would have to go over a small bridge to travel in the area. He stated that there would be pollution from the land being constructed on. He said Stewart’s application discusses other property that isn’t creek side. He commented that Stewart’s claims were speculation on the loss. He said that Stewart only showed one instance where there might be a decrease in value.
Jim Belknap, stated he is the principle broker for Territorial Land Company, Cottage Grove. He said he does land use consulting but they didn’t represent Stewart in the preparation of the application. He indicated he was asked to prepare the valuation to determine what type of compensation could be requested under a Measure 37 claim. He said one of the problems with Measure 37 is that it requires almost a speculative approach of value of what could be done if current land use regulations were not applied to a piece of property. He noted when Stewart acquired the property, there was no zoning in effect and he could have done any type of development. He was given the assignment to determine the highest and best use of the property. He said it was his opinion, that the property as it is currently zoned (rural residential, with a greater level of density) has the highest and best use. He added abutting Stewart’s property is a higher level of density, lots between a half and one acre in size. He said they evaluated the property as if 13 single family residential building sites could be developed. He added it would be a one-acre lot where a septic system could be installed and a well could be constructed that would meet state DEQ standards. He said they estimated what 13 building sites would be worth and they deducted the development costs of the project and arrived at a figure. He said they also determined the current market value of the property and the difference between the two was the compensation figure of $445,000.
Scott Pyle, Cottage Grove, said his concern is water and sewer. He said they have a shallow well but it supplies them until August.
There being no one else signed up to speak, Commission Green closed the Public Hearing.
Green asked about the legitimacy of the claim and what the interpretation is.
Vorhes said the sections that define exempt regulations are not considered restricted land use regulations under the measure. He added that some of the descriptions of situations continue to apply and cannot be waived. He didn’t think the current zone lot division limitations fit into those categories. He said some of the regulations continue to apply to address adequate water and sanitation concerns. He said those regulations are not being recommended to be waived. He said the only restrictions that are being waived are the ones that limit the division of land. He noted that the owner of the property, once the County and state have taken action on Measure 37 claims will still need to apply and show compliance with all of the health and safety regulations that continue to apply to this property. He added that federal and state pollution control regulations would continue to apply.
Sorenson indicated the current ordinance in effect requires an applicant for Measure 37 claim to have an appraisal. He asked if Van Vactor waived the appraisal requirement.
Van Vactor said in reviewing the claim the valuation information they had used comparable sales. He said in previous discussions with the Board on the minimum requirements for discussion on the valuation question of Measure 37, he recommended that as long as they have comparable sales of actual sales and not just assessed valuation and an analysis to the regulation, they had met the minimum requirements of Ballot Measure 37. He said this claim meets the requirement for a waiver.
MOTION: to approve ORDER 06-5-17-16.
Morrison MOVED, Green SECONDED.
VOTE: 2-2 (Dwyer, Sorenson dissenting) MOTION FAILED."

(At this point the motion has failed. There is no motion brought to the floor pertaining to "(B) If any public official’s vote is necessary to meet a requirement of a minimum number of votes to take official action,". The stage is now set for the case against County Commissioner Faye Stewart to be hoist by his own petard,)

The scene is the next month, after the regularly scheduled business of then Lane County Board of Commissioners.

http://www.lanecounty.org/bcc_info/meeting_info/2006/2006Minutes/June/06-6-7pm.htm

"BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS'
REGULAR MEETING
June 7, 2006
1:30 p.m.
Commissioners' Conference Room
APPROVED 1/24/07
Commissioner Bill Dwyer presided with Commissioners Bobby Green, Sr., Anna Morrison and Faye Stewart present. Commissioner Peter Sorenson was present via telephone. County Administrator Bill Van Vactor, Assistant County Counsel Stephen Vorhes and Recording Secretary Melissa Zimmer were also present.
…
18. OTHER BUSINESS
ORDER 06-5-17-16 Considering a Ballot Measure 37 Claim and Deciding Whether to Modify, Remove or Not Apply Restrict Land Use Regulations in Lieu of Providing Just Compensation (Bruce Stewart/PA 05-6478).
Dwyer said Stewart is claiming the rule of necessity and is not allowed to engage in a debate. He said they had the debate and the motion had failed on a 2 to 2 tie. He said they have the Rule of Revision that requires Commissioner Stewart to vote and not to participate in the debate. He said under the Rule of Revision they are going to revisit the Measure 37 claim.
Van Vactor indicated that Vorhes sent the Board an e-mail and paper copy on June 5 that explained this procedure.(Where is that e-mail? ed. note)
Vorhes said in putting this matter on the agenda, they could hear from Stewart on whether or not he has reviewed the record. He stated that any other discussion or debate is not allowed under ORS 244.120.
Dwyer thought the Rule of Necessity was a lousy rule. He advised Stewart to participate in a debate before this. He said the fact that Stewart is related to his father does not deprive his father of certain rights.
MOTION: to approve ORDER 06-5-17-16.
Green MOVED, Morrison SECONDED.
Sorenson objected, he said the motion was already made. Dwyer overruled his objection.
Green said when the applicant made the application, he supported it at that time, not because it was any relative or relationship. He said the applicant stated he intended to do with the property what other claimants had asked for. Green recalled there were 5-0 votes on those. He said by lifting the restriction, it allows that person to go forward to proceed in a manner which they had allowed in other applications. He was trying to be consistent. He supported the motion.
Dwyer asked if they were required to vote, even if there was a conflict.
Vorhes said in ORS 244.120(1), the rule that creates this is an elected public official other than a member of the legislative assembly, or an appointed public official serving on a board or commission shall, when met with a conflict potential or actual, announce the conflict when it is an actual conflict. (see above excerpt for exact wording. ed note) Then the first step is to refrain from participating as a public official in any discussion or debate on the issue out of which the conflict arose. He indicated the Rule of Necessity comes in only if necessary to meet a requirement of a minimum number of votes to take official action. He said the rules for the legislature as he described is in ORS 244.120(1)(a) that states if a public official is a member of the legislative assembly, the public official shall announce publicly pursuant to the rules of the house of which the public official is a member the nature of the conflict before taking any action in the capacity as a public official.(He has now shifted to a part of ORS 244 that does not pertain to a county commissioner. ed note)
Sorenson asked how this was brought up without public notice.
Van Vactor indicated he asked the agenda team whether they wanted to bring it up today or to schedule it later. He said the discussion by the agenda team was to have it today.
Dwyer explained it was his vote and Sorenson’s vote that caused this situation. He stated he wouldn’t change his vote.
Van Vactor added that during adjustments to the agenda that this matter would be brought up.
Stewart stated that under the Rule of Necessity, he had reviewed the documents that were presented, the public testimony on tape and the written comments that had been sent around in the mail. He believed he could make a decision and would vote in favor of the Stewart claim.
VOTE: 3-2 (Dwyer, Sorenson dissenting).
There being no further business, Commissioner Dwyer adjourned the meeting at 2:50 p.m.
Melissa Zimmer
Recording Secretary"

And now the part that they didn't mention.

http://www.aboutlanegov.com/LaneManual%5Cdocuments%5CLM03_2009_07_09.pdf
3,007                                     Lane Manual                                                  3,007
"(11)    Any order of the Board shall be enacted during any properly scheduled meeting. All orders approved by the Board shall be signed on behalf of the Board by the Chair or Vice Chair. Upon being so signed, such order shall be immediately effective unless otherwise provided and shall thereafter be entered in the Board’s journal.
(12)    Unless expressly authorized by the Board, all ordinances, orders, resolutions, directives of the Board (including letters of support or opposition) and written documents reflecting other Board actions shall be signed by the Chair.
(13)    Whenever the Chair and Vice Chair are both absent, the senior-most Commissioner is designated and appointed as Acting Chair for the purpose of approving subdivision plats plots pursuant to Lane Code 2.070.
(14)    The office of the Board shall be located in the Public Service Building, Eugene, Oregon.
(15)    No person shall smoke in any manner at any public meeting of the Board.
(16)    Hearings on land use matters shall conform to the additional requirements of the land use hearing rules.
(17)    Any meeting of the Board may, by majority vote, be adjourned to executive session as permitted by ORS 192.660. Attendance at executive sessions will be restricted by the Board as allowed by law. (Revised by Order No. 00-10-4-1, Effective 10.40.00; 07-10-3-11, 10.3.07)"

http://www.lanecounty.org/LaneCode/documents/CodeChapterx14.pdf

"(6)     Conflicts of Interest:   No member of the Approval Authority shall participate in a hearing or a decision upon an application when he or she:
                     a.   Is a party to or has a direct personal or pecuniary interest in the proposal.
                     b.   Is in the business with the proponent, or
                     c.   For any other reason, has determined that he or she cannot participate in the hearing and decision in an impartial manner."

So from the Lane Code pertaining to land use which the county commissioners were bound by Faye Stewart shall not participate in a hearing or a decision upon an application when he Is a party to or has a direct personal or pecuniary interest in the proposal. Faye Stewart's vote was not "necessary to meet a requirement of a minimum number of votes to take official action,"
Faye Stewart just wanted to give his father, Bruce Stewart over $400,000.00 for "lost value" of his land, and he gets to keep the land.

Next did Faye Stewart obtain tax lot 108 ~~104~~ from Bruce Stewart at a price below what Bruce Stewart believed the property was worth, from his Measure 37 claim valuation information.

Buddha from the Backwoods and the Bloodhound

MagicBus — Sat, 03 Oct 2009 16:19:17 GMT

Buddha from the Backwoods and the Bloodhound

Next week I will be detailing the connections between Faye Stewart, Nancy Glines, Nancy Waggoner, Floyd Prozanski, Community Sharing, South Lane Wheels( Senior Wheels), Senior Meals, The Cottage Grove Community Foundation, The Oregon Community Foundation, Domestic Violence Council of Lane County, Lane County Board of Commissioners, ALF, Lane County Human Services, State of Oregon Housing and Community Services,

The two Foundation trilogies, if you have read the books, “The Foundation Trilogy” you have an idea how this fits that story line, if not here is a brief summary. In the story after the Foundation has taken control of the earth’s resources and government there is a splitting of the people who know how to use technology and the people who use the technology. The two main characters are a man who knows how the technology works and a woman who knows how to use the technology. They are in search of “The Mule” which will allow them to fully utilize their knowledge.

In the current state of affairs one “Foundation Trilogy” is represented by a politician, a “Not for Profit” and a “Community Foundation”. The other Trilogy is represented by Buddha from the Backwoods, the Bloodhound and the Internet. The first Trilogy I will refer to as “The Community”. They use this designation to make people think they are referring to a community when they are actually meaning their tight knit group of “cohorts” in the Service of the Foundation scheme.

The Foundation scheme is to effect social change outside of the established political sphere by diverting Federal and State resources to “Not for Profits” controlled by “Community Foundations”. The “Community Foundations” are arranged as a pyramid from Family, City, region, State, Nation, Council. Within their sphere of influence a Sovereign Foundation can do whatever a larger Sovereign Foundation will allow it to do.

Buddha from the Backwoods and the Bloodhound’s mission is “to raise awareness” about The Foundation.

Obama-Nation Faulty logic and Health Care reform

MagicBus — Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:32:59 GMT

Obama-Nation Faulty logic and Health Care reform
I received the email below from BarackObama.com September 29, 2009. The logic of their argument is that American’s believe what their doctors and nurses tell them, therefore, if doctors and nurses feel that real healthcare reform is needed they mean that they want whatever healthcare reform the Democratic Party and Obama are currently trying to push through Congress. They go on to use the logic that since they have the support for some type of healthcare reform from the leadership of the organizations in the next quote that all members of those organizations support the reform being pushed by the Democrats. “The American Medical Association, Doctors for America, and a dozen other physicians groups representing 500,000 doctors are endorsing reform. So are the American Nurses Association and other organizations representing millions of nurses.”
Then they ask for a donation to quickly put this fake logic on the air to convince the American public. The American public is not voting on healthcare reform, the Democratic Congress is voting to enact this. The Obama-Nation is trying to manipulate public opinion so that the public will pressure their representatives into voting for Obama healthcare while in the back rooms of Congress political deals are being made to use Stimulus Funds to pay off reluctant Congressmen to vote for the Obama-Nation Health Care Bill. Obama supporters will think that their input has changed Congresses votes to pass the Obama-Nation Health Care Bill. When in fact, it was passed by using borrowed money to bribe Congressional votes to get a Healthcare Reform Bill that includes Billions of Dollars diverted to “Not For Profits” McHospitals.
“Mitch Stewart, BarackObama.com info@barackobama.com
Organizing for America
The cavalry is here -- and they're in white coats and scrubs: More than a half a million doctors and millions of nurses are joining forces to help pass real health reform.

Americans listen to their nurses and doctors when it comes to health reform -- and for good reason. If we can help them amplify their voices, it'll be a huge boost to our campaign for change.

So we're working on a new television ad featuring their voices explaining why doctors and nurses so strongly support President Obama's plan -- and asking Congress to pass it. We'll run the ad in key states and districts all around the country to show folks where health professionals stand, cut through the spin, and build even greater support for reform.

But to produce and air the new ad before the Senate starts debating a final bill, we'll need to raise $300,000 by Thursday.
The American Medical Association, Doctors for America, and a dozen other physicians groups representing 500,000 doctors are endorsing reform. So are the American Nurses Association and other organizations representing millions of nurses.

They're speaking out because they see the shortcomings of our health care system firsthand, every day: patients denied the care they prescribe, families losing access to their doctors, and a system that forces them to spend more time with paperwork and less time with patients.

These voices need to be heard -- with so much deception out there clouding the debate, it's critical that medical professionals are able to focus the country on the simple fact that health reform is good medicine.

But the final congressional committee could vote on their reform bill as early as Wednesday -- and debate on final legislation could start by the end of the week. So if we're going to help make these doctors and nurses' voices heard, we'll need to do it right now. Can you chip in $5 or more to help get our ad on the air?”

A small leak can sink a great Ship

MagicBus — Mon, 28 Sep 2009 04:18:23 GMT

A small leak can sink a great Ship

Been burning up the inTernet looking into places that most folks don’t realize are accessible. Each Web page reveals another connection. A name here leads to a Resource that was hidden. That is the way to connect the dots with strings and ties. Measure a board 37 times before you cut. Poor Richard said a long time ago, “Many small strokes will fall a mighty Oak.” “The acorn doesn’t fall far from the tree.”

A DVD holds 4 Gigabytes of data, the average E-mail is 50 K, therefore someone might put 100,000 E-mails on a DVD and walk out with IT.
24K