|
|
Foundation Trilogy
Last post 33 minutes ago by MagicBus. 149 replies.
-
04-25-2008, 12:16 AM |
|
|
Annastacia posted "Magistrates do have the authority to decide cases in federal court. In fact, most cases are routed to magistrates. Also, the judge indicated that there is no right for court appointed attorney and denied the request. "
If you sign a consent to let them, a Magistrate can adjudicate your case. The magistrate at this point can not decide anything he is only making a recommendation to a real Federal Judge. Federal Judge appointed by President of United States, Magistrate Judge has his, in Judge Coffins instance, reappointment commented by a panel of citizens and approved by a Federal Judge last October. His term expired on February 24, 2008 and he was re-appointed in October last. The question of the appointment of an attorney was commented on by the Magistrate as not presenting a "compelling reason", that is to say, I needed to present a compelling narrative for why I should have an attorney appointed, not just asking for one because it is provided for in the HUD regulations. Considering the fact that the Governor of Oregon told a gathering of the Oregon Bar that they should each contribute more to a fund that is overseen by the Oregon Community Foundation, I will most likely opt for an out of state attorney and have the case heard in a different state. I’m not the type to call things a conspiracy, it is just a group of people pooling their money for their own investing benefit. Problem is that they just lost massive amounts of capital in the ARMs, adjusted rate mortgages, and the China investments. Faye is also feeling the effects of having any of his personal loans backed by either land or timber being reassessed. His supposed pull for getting "Foundation grants" is not what it used to be, because they removed the stipulation that 5% of "Community Foundation" fund having to be "granted" to a "not for profit". Consider this, the Community Foundation of Oregon is billed in their news releases as having "almost a BILLION dollars" in assets. There is a "Stewart" on their board of directors. Faye has in the past said in Lane County Oregon County Commission meetings that he would talk to the Community Foundation of Oregon concerning obtaining grants for Lane County. Ask yourself this, why isn’t he doing that at this time. Seems like ANY grants he could get would free up an equal amount of funds for Public Safety, something that would directly affect your safety. It would also directly impact the amount of visitors coming to the Olympic track trials. So like the commercial says, "the whole world is watching". Faye’s family has about One Million Dollars in the foundation, 5% of that could effect the current budget in a positive way.
Something else that needs to be looked into is if the land put into foundation "trusts" are really exempt from taxation.
|
|
-
04-25-2008, 9:36 AM |
-
Halo
-
-
-
Joined on 03-04-2007
-
-
Posts 124
-
-
|
No matter how many times reality smacks him down, he keeps bouncing back up! :)
He's the unemployed, welfare absorbing, public-service-wasting Bo-Bo doll!
How can a person maximize his/her drain on society? Start by failing to get a job or contribute in ANY other way. Then apply for welfare benefits of every possible kind. Then, while firmly attached to the public teat, start a frenzy of public service abuse. Make repeated and frivolous demands for police service to harass your neighbor, send a barrage of impossibly broad public records demands to public agencies, file baseless, valueless lawsuits in federal court -- that sort of thing. To really add insult to injury, demand that you're entitled to a court-appointed lawyer at taxpayer expense!
This is appalling, and it demonstrates how the generosity and compassion of this wonderful country and it's people can be abused. Any idiot with internet access and an ax to grind can bleed of tens of thousands of government resources by forcing them to reply to frivolous calls/complaints/demands.
How many leaches are there? A lot, I'm sure. We see evidence of them all the time. Members of the media generally have the good sense to ignore such people, but government agencies are forced to respond, no matter how idiotic or indecipherable the allegation.
There ought to be some process by which the government could request sanctions for such willful abuse. Such people could not be fined, of course, because they don't work, but they could be forced to choose between picking up debris along the side of the highway or spending a day sitting on the sidewalk outside our closed county jail.
|
|
-
04-25-2008, 11:33 AM |
|
|
When I first started reading your post I thought you were talking about the Stewards. How much federal timber subsidy money do you reckon has been spent on their lands? I read one article in the Oregonian that they were able to get the feds to build a million-dollar road for them. Care to guess how much land they have acquired through "mining claims". Then consider the tax write off they get for having over a million dollars in the Community Foundation of Oregon. Consider this. The CFO "grants" money to the Community Sharing Program of Cottage Grove, then The Community Sharing Program of Cottage Grove "grants" money to Faye Stewart’s Bohemian Mining Gathering. It’s coming up soon, you ought to attend.
Your reference to "To really add insult to injury, demand that you're entitled to a court-appointed lawyer at taxpayer expense!" The court-appointed lawyer at taxpayer expense remark refers to a part of the HUD rules that are part of Federal Law. Are you now taking a stance to disregard federal law if you happen to think they will be used against your master? To see actual abuse of the system check into the folks that get the federal HUD funds to build and run the low income mass housing. You will have a chance considering that Oregon is set to receive $ 100,000,000.00 this year. Locally watch which properties are bought and which contractors are picked to build them. Back check them with Foundation in a goggle check. You can be sure to see Faye directing a share to his favorite Cottage Grove concubine. What I am referring to is how the "the generosity and compassion of this wonderful country" is currently being absorbed by the folks you are so vehemently defending. Another place to watch is the Lane County Council of Governments. They probably won’t be getting their tribute money from Lane County this year.
Your next tirade deserves special comment.
"How many leaches are there? A lot, I'm sure. We see evidence of them all the time. Members of the media generally have the good sense to ignore such people, but government agencies are forced to respond, no matter how idiotic or indecipherable the allegation." This vile remark is coming from the same person who has been using this forum to complain about the federal government not continuing a "welfare" payment to Lane County for $47,000,000.00 a year to fund projects he wants. The
Payments were agreed to end on a specific date, yet you feel that the rules should be changed so you personally can benefit from the funding. Faye went to Washington to lobby for the $23,000,000.00 that he could control for "Forest projects". So how long do you think it would take for my wife’s $600 dollar SSI check to equal one year of Fay’s "forest projects" slush fund or the $100,000,000.00 end homelessness fund.
Now as your comments relate to you and your family specifically, Have you ever had a federally backed home loan, college loan, driven on a road built with federal funds, been saved from fire by federal funds, or had your sniveling whining behind protected by federally funded soldiers that defend your right to say the foolish things you say. Personally my family members have fought in every American Conflict since the early 1700’s. In WWII there was Woodrow Wilson Bussey who flew with the Flying Tigers over China, Hez Bussey, who went on the Baatan Death march, ended up blind, went to law school blind, ended up Chief Justice Oklahoma Court of Appeals, my father Chief Bussey served in the Navy just after Pearl Harbor, all his other 12 brothers and sisters served the country whose laws and principals you take so lightly. For you to have the unmitigated audacity to besmirch me and my family for using the laws of the United States of America to ferret out corrupt politico’s is beyond laughable and borders on being pathetic. I will thank you to keep your asinine uninformed anti-American remarks in check.
|
|
-
04-25-2008, 2:09 PM |
-
triwanda
-
-
-
Joined on 03-31-2008
-
-
Posts 8
-
-
|
Personally my family members have fought in every American Conflict since the early 1700’s. In WWII there was Woodrow Wilson Bussey who flew with the Flying Tigers over China, Hez Bussey, who went on the Baatan Death march, ended up blind, went to law school blind, ended up Chief Justice Oklahoma Court of Appeals, my father Chief Bussey served in the Navy just after Pearl Harbor, all his other 12 brothers and sisters served the country whose laws and principals you take so lightly.
Yes, but, what have you actually done? Seems like the family members who were actually contributing members of society are all retired or dead.
|
|
-
04-25-2008, 6:29 PM |
|
|
So we revert to a variation of "the black widow club", justify your existence without referring to your job or family history. I’ll go first then triwanda, if that is your real name, can go then halo.
First I mention my fathers side of the family to illustrate that my point that most of "oregonians" are new comers to the North American continent and to America. The "Stewart" branch of my mothers side trace their lineage to around 250 ad, through a King Egbert in the 1200’s, their family crest is in the doomsday book, includes ermine for royalty and shells for crusade campaigns. That’s neither here nor there, just background.
While spending 20 years taking care of my invalid father I ran a 2 county Salvation Army unit. Personally moved the furniture to re furnish 50 burn-outs, loaded tons of canned goods then distributed them to folks for over 10 years. Personally picked up 15 tons of firewood, as 4 foot logs, 5 times a year for 15 years for a local viet nam Veterans groups 3 day camp on the river. At the present time I am engaged in bringing to light the gross wastefulness of Lane County’s use of federal housing monies and the entrenched gang that controls it. What I have encountered from the peanut gallery is; don’t question what our favorite sons are doing with federal money, don’t ask embarrassing questions, don’t dare ask to see public documents that could show their true colors. You would think that Faye would have jumped right up and released his e-mails and said these are what I have been doing to protect and promote the peoples business. Bobby Green is running again for his post, where is evidence of how he has fought the good fight to the best of his ability to protect the people of Lane County, Oregon. Where has either of them given the last full measure in the fight to keep law enforcement alive and well in Lane County. We have a law enforcement system that has been de-funded and all they can say is…. What? What are they saying in defense of presiding over the worst period of ignoring public safety in the history of Oregon?
So triwanda, justify YOUR existence and defend the wretched County commissioners you feel so obligated to promote.
|
|
-
07-17-2008, 2:47 AM |
-
Halo
-
-
-
Joined on 03-04-2007
-
-
Posts 124
-
-
|
Whacko-wing-nut silenced. Frivolous claims given burial :)
Well FT, as predicted many months ago, the federal court has confirmed that your false allegations against the commissioners are meritless.
Just as predicted, the big federal lawsuit you threatened went nowhere. Nothing. Nada.
When the dust settled, and your case was summarily dismissed, the reality of all this silliness was permanently and indelibly underscored:
1) There never was any impropriety, illegality or ethical breach on the part of the county commissioners. It was obvious to most from the beginning, but it's nice to have a federal judge confirm it.
2) This was never anything but sour-grapes on your part, because Commissioner Stewart wasn't able to help you continue your taxpayer-subsidized housing arrangements.
3) Your conclusions concerning the budget you refused to read and didn't understand were incorrect. You're confused about accounting practices and law applicable to government budget reporting. Nearly every one of your assumptions was wrong, and your conclusions of law were even farther off the mark.
I was worried that it might take longer to put this silliness to bed.
As over-burdened as the judicial system is, it's nice to see that the federal courts can still cut through the hog-wash and promptly produce justice in the civil arena.
|
|
-
03-31-2009, 12:09 PM |
-
MagicBus
-
-
-
Joined on 02-07-2009
-
-
Posts 92
-
-
|
To help follow what Hope was talking about in her post Foundation Imagination" and funding by Hope http://community.kmtr.com/forums/thread/3775078.aspx
“Halo wrote the following post at 07-17-2008 2:47 AM: Well FT, as predicted many months ago, the federal court has confirmed that your false allegations against the commissioners are meritless. Just as predicted, the big federal lawsuit you threatened went nowhere. Nothing. Nada. When the dust settled, and your case was summarily dismissed, the reality of all this silliness was permanently and indelibly underscored:”
Actually, I withdrew the case myself for strategic reasons.
“Halo wrote 1) There never was any impropriety, illegality or ethical breach on the part of the county commissioners. It was obvious to most from the beginning, but it's nice to have a federal judge confirm it.”
The facts were never heard by a Federal Judge, the case was in the hands of a magistrate judge, picked by 5 people and appointed by the governor. The case had not advanced past the first step when I realized that it would be better to have it heard in a neutral court by a real Federal Judge.
“Halo wrote: 2) This was never anything but sour-grapes on your part, because Commissioner Stewart wasn't able to help you continue your taxpayer-subsidized housing arrangements.”
The housing funds were Federal Housing funds and Faye Stewart's injecting his personal agenda was part of my complaint. I notified the State of Oregon that the “not for profit” that Faye Stewart sat on the board of and “granted” federal housing funds to was not providing the services that they were billing the government for.
“Halo wrote 3) Your conclusions concerning the budget you refused to read and didn't understand were incorrect. You're confused about accounting practices and law applicable to government budget reporting. Nearly every one of your assumptions was wrong, and your conclusions of law were even farther off the mark.”
And now Lane County has a balanced budget and a well funded law enforcement department???
“Halo wrote I was worried that it might take longer to put this silliness to bed. As over-burdened as the judicial system is, it's nice to see that the federal courts can still cut through the hog-wash and promptly produce justice in the civil arena.”
Thanks to Liane Inkster Richardson’s actions the 2 year “statute of limitations” is extended to 2011.
|
|
-
04-01-2009, 8:48 AM |
-
Hope
-
-
-
Joined on 04-05-2007
-
-
Posts 93
-
-
|
So "Foundation Trilogy" = "MagicBus" = "Theeyelady" = Mr. Bussey?
One person can have three screen names here? How does that work?
Mr. Bussey, you've beat this dead horse, well, to death, about five times over.
You're wrong about the impropriety of the funding practices you describe. The county and city are audited by federal and private accounting teams several times per year, and you've been whining about this for several years, at least, so you're wrong about the assumptions you're making. The practices you're confusing are perfectly legal. In fact they are the norm for funding non-profit organizations, many of which are funded to deliver mandated services because they deliver the services at lower cost to taxpayers. You've obviously had that explained to you by the attorney general, FBI, district attorney, local police agencies and a federal judge, but you keep coming back to beat on the dead horse some more. If anybody else cared about your stories they've long since grown bored of them.
I know you consider this exercising your freedom of speech, but it feels more like impairing the rights of others, because you hijack any and every other thread to retread your distorted views. You only write about two subjects, your alleged victimization, which has been thoroughly and permanently debunked by all the authorities, and your unorthodox views on accounting, which have been rejected by all the people who know the law.
You were more polite for a while, but now you're back to trying to make every thread your soap-box for resolved issues. Why not go back to your former practice of starting a thread and then being the only one to post to it? That way you get to express yourself, but you don't bother the rest of the readers here who grew tired of your theories two years ago.
|
|
-
-
04-03-2009, 12:03 PM |
-
clueless
-
-
-
Joined on 02-23-2007
-
-
Posts 25
-
-
|
The Commissioners are saints compared to what is going on in the 4j school district:
To help close a gap in the 2009-10 budget pegged at nearly $16 million, Superintendent George Russell has decided he won’t replace either Yvonne Curtis, who was hired in 2004 to be the director of student achievement, or Arbrella Luvert, who has filled the post of equity and diversity coordinator as a principal on special assignment. Luvert is retiring, while Curtis has been hired to be the new schools superintendent in Forest Grove.
Russell also intends to fold two other administrative positions — deputy superintendent and assistant superintendent for management services — into a single, hybrid position. Tom Henry, who held the former position, is retiring; Carl Hermanns held the latter job and will move into the new job position.
All told, eliminating those jobs will save the district about $500,000 a year, said Susan Fahey, director of financial services. Including all benefits, compensation costs are $188,000 for Henry’s position, $162,000 for Curtis’, $127,000 for Luvert’s and $74,000 for the administrative assistant.
Are you kidding me ? School workers in Eugene Oregon being paid this kind of money ? This is at least 6 times the average salary in this town. This is more of a travesty than CEO pay as this is being paid directly out of OUR taxes. And of course I did not mention the 50k+ a year pension poor Tom Henry will be pulling down for life.
You can rest assured of one thing - I WILL be contacting Jim Torrey and the other 4J board members. There are people working in this God Forsaken county for $8 per hour and cannot even feed thier familes and these robber barrons are being paid this kind of money ? And then they sqwak about not having enough money to buy books and meals for poor kids...
Enough is enough. This is madness and needs to stop now !
|
|
-
-
04-07-2009, 2:26 PM |
-
MagicBus
-
-
-
Joined on 02-07-2009
-
-
Posts 92
-
-
|
Welcome to the official “Foundation” thread
Welcome to the official “Foundation” thread. To make things easier to find and track, I will be posting to this thread only for the inside information about the various foundation topics. In the post See http://community.kmtr.com/forums/3818114/ShowThread.aspx#3818114 "Bait and Switch" for reply under "NEWS" -> "SOUNDOFF" I mentioned that the foundations would be re-writing history, circa 1984. Look at web page http://thinkfinity.org/home.aspx To see how one foundation, “Verizon reads” is putting $35 million to this goal. Guess where Verizon gets the money to “grant’ those funds? It’s the Verizon customers. Who gets to pick the contributors and how much to pay them? That part is out of sight from the public. No chance of graft or nepotism in this set up. No chance for political pay-offs or favors. The Verizon $35 million is just one group funding this website. The web site is just a glorified links page for students that could be prepared by the typical 7th grade student. I will call this Foundation Ploy # 1: funding an “ apple pie” project to mask questionable payments.
|
|
-
04-08-2009, 2:31 PM |
-
MagicBus
-
-
-
Joined on 02-07-2009
-
-
Posts 92
-
-
|
Are Lane County Commissioners above the law?
Are Lane County Commissioners above the law? From http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0409/20992.html “An angry federal judge set aside the conviction of former Sen. Ted Stevens on Tuesday, and will pursue criminal contempt charges against the Stevens prosecution team, accusing Department of Justice prosecutors of deliberate and repeated misconduct in their handling of the corruption case against the former senator from Alaska. In an extraordinary courtroom session, Judge Emmet Sullivan berated Justice Department officials for failing to turn over critical evidence to Stevens’ defense team both before and after his trial.” In the former Sen. Ted Stevens trial the Judge calls for DOJ probe because of alleged misconduct by the DOJ prosecutors. “Accusing Department of Justice prosecutors of deliberate and repeated misconduct in their handling of the corruption case against the former senator from Alaska… for failing to turn over critical evidence to Stevens’ defense team both before and after his trial… government was caught making false representations and not meeting its discovery obligations.” “I don’t think there’s anything worse than our government putting on false evidence, manufacturing evidence, to get the upper hand,” Brendan Sullivan, Stevens’ attorney said. Pollack added: “Will judges be a little more vigilant in policing the Department of Justice in meeting its obligations as a result of this experience? I think that they will be in public corruption cases and cases involving the Public Integrity Section in particular.” So what does this have to do with Faye Stewart, Lane County Oregon County Commissioner? In our hearing by email with the Lane County Commissioners, they relied on the letter of denial of federal housing funds from Nancy Wagonner. This letter did not contain the federally required reference of what documents that Lane County Oregon was required to provide to us. It relied on a bogus eviction notice given to us by our landlord that was predicated on a known false “month to month rental agreement” faxed to the attorney of our landlord. It relied on a non-existent document, David Flores “Plan for Self Sufficiency”. When I requested that specific document from our Community Sharing of Cottage Grove Oregon case file, Lane County tried to fax me a different document that they had “lifted” from the internet, enlarged and taped to a piece of paper. It jammed their fax machine 5 times before they told me about the circumstances of the “created evidence”. Later, they sent me an email stating that it came from the internet and not from our case file. Are Lane County Commissioners above the law?
|
|
-
04-08-2009, 7:47 PM |
-
04-10-2009, 8:19 PM |
-
MagicBus
-
-
-
Joined on 02-07-2009
-
-
Posts 92
-
-
|
Faxed to Governor Kulongoski 4/9/2009 2:08 PM
Thursday, April 09, 2009 Faxed 4/9/2009 2:08 PM FAX 503.378.6827 Governor Kulongoski Katherine Wentzel, Citizen’s Contact Analyst Greetings; In your letter of March 23, 2009 (response to our fax of March 4, 2009) “Governors Office Response Letter” “Dear Mr. Bussey: Thank you for your faxed message to the Governor’s office on March 4, 2009 after your conversation with one of our citizen volunteers earlier that day. In an effort to be of assistance, we contacted staff at Oregon Housing and Community Services to discuss your complaints specific to the HOME Tenant-Based Assistance Program (HTBA). As you are aware, Oregon Housing and Community Services (OHCS) is responsible for the administration of funds and services for the HOME Tenant-Based Assistance Program (HTBA), which uses federal funds to subsidize rental payments for qualifying families and individuals. This program is funded through the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development and is designed to provide household with transitional rental assistance and case management to assist them in moving toward self-sufficiency. OHCS contracts with various public service agencies to administer this program, including housing authorities, community action agencies, and local partnership programs. At your request and that of Susan Smith, OHCS conducted an informal administrative review of your complaint against Lane County Human Services Commission regarding possible inappropriate processing of your HTBA. It was found that Lane County Human Services Commission performed required obligations in accordance with the terms and conditions of HTBA program, including specific grant program requirements, directives from OHCS, and applicable law. A hearing on November 21, 2006, by the Lane County Human Services Commission, considering a complaint by you and Susan Smith, found that Lane County Services Commission’s Community Sharing Program (“subrecipient”) complied with rules, regulations, guidelines and directives applicable to HTBA and, furthermore, that the 2006 termination of you from Lane County’s HTBA be upheld. Based on the information we obtained, we believe OHCS acted in good faith in addressing your complaints, therefore, we have determined that no further investigation is required. Because we do not have authority over local or federal governments, elected officials, or legal issues we cannot offer any further assistance with this matter. Sincerely, Katherine Wentzel Citizens’ Contact Analyst Cc: Oregon Congressional Delegation Lane County District Attorney” From Nancy Waggoner, Home TBA Coordinator Lane County Human Services Commission, Eugene Oregon. This is the termination of services (HTBA) we received that terminated our HTBA rental subsidy (“Termination Letter”). As you can see, it does not comply with HUD requirements in that it does not specifically state that we shall have access to certain documents or the listed process for getting a hearing. In the first paragraph, it references a “30-day eviction notice from your landlord” (“Eviction Notice”) This eviction notice was predicated on a known bogus “month to month rental agreement” faxed to Dean Kaufman, attorney for landlord, by Nancy Waggoners office. The eviction notice was inappropriate for two reasons: 1. It was based on a “month to month rental agreement” instead of the HUD approved lease that Nancy Waggoner had sent to us a few months earlier. 2. It was in retaliation for the accommodation request (“Accommodation Request”) . The accommodation request refusal only goes the point of the attitude of the landlord. The eviction based on this notice never went to court. Therefore, using it as a reason for removing us from HTBA is improper. The fact that Nancy Waggoners office sent a known bogus document to the landlord’s attorney shows that she was complicit in the attempted bogus eviction process. In the second paragraph it references a self-sufficiency plan by David Flores. This document was not in our case file. When we asked HTBA for the self sufficiency plan from our Community Sharing file they faxed us a known fraudulent document. They “lifted” from the internet a document, enlarged it and taped it to a piece of paper and tried to fax it to us. It jammed their fax machine 5 times until they finally confessed to me that it was a mocked up document. In an email to me they also confirmed that it was not from our Community Sharing case file, but was from the internet. We have an approved accommodation that relieved Kyle from the “job search” requirement because of Susan’s disability. Community Sharing, Lane County Human Services and the Lane County Commissioners all recognized that this accommodation was in effect when they agreed to hold hearings by E-mail. As part of our official document to the Governor’s Office request, please include all E-mails concerning this incident. Therefore, the termination from HTBA is wholly based on a deficient termination letter and supported by 2 known bogus documents. In the (“Governors Office Response Letter”) it states “Based on the information we obtained, we believe OHCS acted in good faith in addressing your complaints, therefore, we have determined that no further investigation is required.” We had an occasion to call Katherine Wentzel, Citizens’ Contact Analyst, to request the information she obtained. She refused to send us anything only stating that her opinion was based on “working with these people for a long period of time”. I now officially request the information she received that she based her opinion on that OHCS, Lane County Human Services Commission, Lane County Board of County Commissioners and Community Sharing Program of Cottage Grove “complied with rules, regulations, guidelines and directives applicable to HTBA”. The question of whether the statute of limitations on this incident have ended. 1. Lane County DA has had an open investigation concerning the shooting incidents involved in this case until at least January 2009. 2. Our case file is in the hands of County Counsel Liane Richardson, we again asked her for the documents that are required of her to give to us according to HUD regulations that should have been enumerated in the original termination letter. She refused and falsely stated that she knew they had already been sent to us. 3. In our original termination letter (“Termination Letter”) we were not told of the required documents that are to be made available to us and until such a time that that information is officially made known to us from her office the original termination proceedings are still in progress and all legal remedies remain open. 4. “Based on the information we obtained, we believe OHCS acted in good faith in addressing your complaints, therefore, we have determined that no further investigation is required.” This statement is evidence that even if the state had been under the impression that the statute of limitations had expired for this incident, the State of Oregon holding any type of investigation into this incident restarts the statute of limitation time clock. 5. The Washington DC branch of HUD Enforcement Division is currently looking into this incident. 6. The Eugene Branch of the FBI is currently looking into this incident. We await your reply on our request for all documents and emails relating to this incident. If we do not receive them within 10 days, we assume that the Governors Office is in support of using fraudulent writings and known bogus documents in the removal of a disabled person from federally subsidized housing. As you know we can initiate a case in federal case on behalf of the United States of America to hear this matter outside of the Oregon Federal Court District. Misconduct in using Federal Housing Funds may result in: Fines, Federal Prison Time (“Fraudulent Writings Warning”) or loss of use of Funds for 5 years(HUD regulations). The Funds would still be available to Oregon, just not administered by the entities convicted. Thank You for Your Time click link for copy of Waggoner letter
Warning from HOME TBA LeaseFaxed to Governor Kulongoski 4/9/2009 2:08 PM
|
|
Page 6 of 10 (150 items)
... 6 ...
|
|