Welcome to Sign in | Join | Help
in
Back to KMTR.com Home Forums Event Calendar Photos Videos Sign Up How to... KMTR Weather Blog

Why FIVE Commissioners?

Last post 04-01-2009, 11:27 AM by clueless. 3 replies.
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  •  11-28-2008, 12:41 PM 3603933

    Why FIVE Commissioners?

    Why not just three?

    Commissioner Sorenson doesn't ever come to work unless he can be on TV (meetings), so there must not be much to do. Why not cut back to just three of them?

    The county has lost about 400 employees since the 1970s, but they have gained two commissioners. It wont make much difference, but it would save a couple hundred thousand that could be spent on public health or something else of value to the people of Lane County. It certainly couldn't be spent on anything of LESS value to the citizens.
  •  12-04-2008, 10:26 PM 3609997 in reply to 3603933

    Re: Why FIVE Commissioners?

    This week when county land management reported that they will be laying off 23 positions, south eugene sorenson admonished the land management department for not putting more thought into making a profit out of using all those emptied cubes to make money. after all, he noted, this is a public asset  - lots of real estate --and when he had a business if it tripled in size he would have been looking for office space, he said. thius was an excellent opportunity, he said. i think he is the obvious real brains on the board. i don't know why we haven't figured this out before. the real estate market is the best place to look for business, especially for a public agency. i really think the county ought to put the county budget aside and devote the next several months into figuring out how to responsibly use this public asset - those cube spaces and desks that all those employees will vacate. it's no less than a public outrage that those simpleton county employees have not stepped up to the plate on this issue already. i know there are many businesses that are growing during this economic boom, and looking for office space to locate their burgeoning offices. plus there are many county programs that are planning to provide increased service levels due to the anticipated huge revenue increases while the county spends the secure rural schools money received for the next 4 years on paying down the county debt. i think fleenor is who we need right now as well, to urge land management to drill down and figure out how they can capitlize on this office space. he's the other brains on the board right now. i really don't think anything else, including the county budget or any other thing, should take priority above this issue. i can't wait until handy gets in there so we can really get some sound budget decisions and priority setting at lane county.
  •  12-15-2008, 11:25 PM 3622920 in reply to 3603933

    Re: Why FIVE Commissioners?

    I do not know what all the duties of a commissioner are, so I do not know if we can keep five of them productive on a regular basis.  I am concerned that representative government is failing us and I am not convinced reducing the number would improve that condition.  I think we need to elect them county-wide while retainig the districts and then encourage/demand we get value from them.
  •  04-01-2009, 11:27 AM 3803176 in reply to 3603933

    Re: Why FIVE Commissioners?

    Becasue Government NEVER downsizes....
View as RSS news feed in XML
Inergize Digital Media This site powered by Inergize Digital Media. The views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of this station.